skelton;1234 wrote:Dustin, what levels of iron contamination can a hard chrome process resist before failures in the deposit occur?
It will vary depending upon who you talk to. I've got more experience with decorative chrome where 2opg of metallic contamination (zinc, copper, nickel, iron, lead, etc) is generally considered on the high end and as you get higher than 3 or 4opg your plating range gets much smaller. For hard chrome, this is much less of a problem due to the (usually) lower chrome/sulfate ratio and (usually) higher current densities.
To directly answer your question: it is up to the plater to determine what levels are acceptable. As your metallic contamination levels grow, the chrome deposit will become more impure, leading to potential failures in the field. Personally, I'd invest in a porous pot (or multiple pots) to maintain the metallics less than 2opg total.
skelton;1234 wrote:Also, why is tin/lead inert in chromic acid vs. iron or steel?
Lead anodes form an insoluble lead peroxide film on their surface when a current is applied. This is the "chocolate brown" film that you sometimes hear described. This layer also protects the underlying lead metal from attack from the chrome bath. As the current is removed and the anodes are allowed to sit in the bath, the peroxide layer breaks down. The lead is then exposed to the chrome bath. Lead chromates can form, which are inhibitors to current flow. They can form a crusty, flaky deposit that is yellow in color and can be very stubborn to remove. There are specific descalers for this problem available from your chemical supplier. Recent research has shown that an excess of mist-suppressant can increase the problem of the chromate scale.
The tin in the anodes makes the anodes more rigid. Over time, a pure lead anode will bend in the direction toward the work piece. Old school platers just rotated their anodes or hammered them back into shape. Now, tin and or antimony is used at around 5-8% to prevent or minimize this.
Steel/iron anodes will not form the protective peroxide layer and are therefore subject to rapid attack by the chrome bath.
-Dustin Gebhardt,
CEF
Plating Engineer
Danaher Tool Group
Gastonia, NC